http://danielhonigman.disqus.com/Daniel B. Honigman's siteenSat, 09 Jun 2007 18:07:53 -0000http://danielhonigman.com/chicago-2016-update-london-2012-logo-blech/#comment-3883725Ha.DanielSat, 09 Jun 2007 18:07:53 -0000http://danielhonigman.com/chicago-2016-update-london-2012-logo-blech/#comment-3883724Hate to say it, but I'm not feeling that logo for the Olympics, either. I mean, it would be cool for something else -- like livening-up a boring subway tunnel view. But for the Olympics? Not!kweenkongSat, 09 Jun 2007 11:25:27 -0000http://danielhonigman.com/chicago-2016-update-london-2012-logo-blech/#comment-3883723It certainly stands out, James.DanielFri, 08 Jun 2007 15:45:59 -0000http://danielhonigman.com/chicago-2016-update-london-2012-logo-blech/#comment-3883722Ha. Thanks for pointing it out!DanielTue, 05 Jun 2007 13:28:51 -0000http://danielhonigman.com/chicago-2016-update-london-2012-logo-blech/#comment-3883721I think it's perfect - if the year is 1984 and the subliminal message is "ZOR" (see it?).Jason - GorillaSushiTue, 05 Jun 2007 12:44:12 -0000http://danielhonigman.com/chicago-2016-update-london-2012-logo-blech/#comment-3883720I like the London 2012 logo; I think when you compare it to the previous Olympic logos it really stands out! It just looks so dynamic too.JamesTue, 05 Jun 2007 11:13:31 -0000